The Strength to Embrace Others in Ambiguity
In an age when the memories of war still lingered in the corners of Japan’s cities, and the light of scientific progress began to cast its own shadows, Kato Shuichi emerged as a rare critic—one who questioned, from the perspective of a physician, the relationship between human beings and the society that sustains them.
Born in Hiroshima, he studied hematology at the University of Tokyo, witnessing firsthand the harsh reality of war. During those years, he grew deeply uneasy with the way human life was being reduced to numbers and statistics in the name of science. This unease later crystallized into his quiet conviction: “Medicine alone cannot save the human being.”
Laying aside his white coat, Kato stepped into the world of words.
He moved freely across literature, philosophy, art, and society, asserting that knowledge was not a possession but a way of living. For him, criticism was not the act of arriving at conclusions but of continuing to think while observing reality. It was a form of disciplined attention, a dialogue between intellect and compassion.
His perspective, shaped during the war, allowed him to stand between reason and unreason—between the logic of science and the fragility of human emotion—without losing balance.
He had seen the madness of authority and never forgot the danger of systems that consume the individual in the name of ideology. For the rest of his life, he kept a deliberate distance from every form of power, preserving an independence of mind that was never cold or detached. Beneath his critique lay trust in human dignity and a quiet hope in reason itself. His words held both severity and warmth; even in sharp debate, one could sense a faint tenderness, like a prayer. His oft-quoted line, “Criticism is doubt in the form of love,” perfectly captures this spirit.
In his seminal An Introduction to the History of Japanese Literature (1959), Kato traced the movement of feeling from ancient waka to modern fiction, not as a chronology of styles but as a living pulse of the human heart through time.
For him, literature was a space where the spirit of each era breathes through emotion. Beneath logic there was always poetry, and within poetry, a quiet breath of reason—that was the essence of his style. Unlike contemporaries such as Kobayashi Hideo or Maruyama Masao, Kato did not confine thought within academic systems; he found philosophy in everyday gestures and ordinary speech. This view of scholarship as criticism rooted in the living world inspired later thinkers such as Tada Tomio and Yoro Takeshi to reconsider the bond between humanity and knowledge.
During the 1960s, Kato taught in Paris, Berlin, Vancouver, and Harvard, engaging in thoughtful dialogue with Claude Lévi-Strauss, André Malraux, and others.
Fluent in several languages, he never fully assimilated into any one culture. For him, translation was not the mere exchange of words but an act of “thinking together while accepting what cannot be conveyed.”
In the Western-centered map of knowledge, he quietly placed another point of view—one grounded in Asian experience, in the sensibility that honors silence, and in the strength to accept ambiguity. Through this, he revealed that universality need not be singular.
For Kato, culture was not a fixed inheritance or rigid institution but a living space born from the layering of experiences.
In An Introduction to the History of Japanese Literature, logic and lyricism, system and nature, speech and silence intersect and breathe together. In that ceaseless movement, he found the essence of Japanese culture—a vision that sees ambiguity not as weakness but as the quiet strength to embrace the other.
At a time when postwar Japan struggled with a loss of identity, Kato’s perspective offered a rare compass: to rediscover the multiple voices within one’s own tradition, rather than measuring it by Western standards or idealizing it in reaction. Through that act of careful excavation, he reopened Japan’s intellectual heritage to the world.
Even when writing on politics or social issues, Kato avoided anger. His irony carried no hatred, only sorrow and kindness toward human folly. His humor, born of compassion, softened the edge of reason and revealed the gentle flexibility of a mind that moved freely between logic and feeling.
In his later years, he observed aging and death with calm curiosity. “I am not without fear,” he once said, “but I find it interesting.”
He regarded the changes in his body as phenomena to be studied—an attitude that fused the clarity of a physician with the tenderness of a philosopher. To him, even death was a continuation of inquiry, an extension of thought.
“The act of knowing is much like the act of living,” he wrote—words that express the very core of his philosophy. Knowledge, for Kato, was not an accumulation of facts but an act of understanding others and opening oneself to the world—a practice of freedom.
He belonged to no single discipline, no ideology, no nation, and yet he was deeply rooted in them all.
That very in-betweenness was his strength. Scholar and artist, realist and dreamer, he inhabited the borders between worlds, making of them a place of quiet insight. His thought was never a weapon against the age, but a small light for those who continue to think in silence.
Today, as we once again face the tension between science and society, his voice still reaches us—not as doctrine, but as a question whispered through time:
If Shuichi Kato were to look upon our world, what words would he choose, and what silences would he keep?
That enduring, quiet question is what keeps his wisdom alive.
The Person Behind the Work Pleurisy
An Unexpected Recess at the Edge of Death
Soon after entering medical school, Kato fell ill with pleurisy and was said to have drifted close to death.
The illness became, at once, an “accidental leave” that spared him from military service and a quiet awakening to the truth that everyday life is never guaranteed.
During an exam period, he faced a test that no textbook had prepared him for―the possibility of death itself. From then on, he seemed to carry a measured sense of distance, a recognition that no system, however rational, is absolute.
With a trace of humor, one might say that the young “medical student destined to heal others” suddenly became the patient instead―a scholar taking a leave of absence, observing medicine from the far side of the bedsheet.
The Poetic Circle Matinée Poétique
During his student years, Kato co-founded Matinée Poétique, a poetry group with Shinichiro Nakamura and Takehiko Fukunaga.
While enrolled in the medical faculty, he nurtured a deep fascination with French literature and poetry―a striking harmony of reason and imagination.
The group gathered in dormitory rooms to read their rhymed verses aloud; one of their poems, Sakura Yokochō, was even set to music.
The image of medical students holding a poetry reading has its own quiet charm―like doctors in white coats composing tanka between experiments.
For Kato, poetry was not an escape from science but another kind of anatomy: an exploration of language as a living body.
His Father, Shinichi ― and the Distance of Literature
Medicine ran in the Kato family. His father, Shinichi, was also a physician, though he never fully entered the world of literature.
Kato, aware of his father’s presence and restraint, sensed a silent gap between them―an unspoken divide over what literature meant.
In The Song of the Sheep, he recalls visiting the poet Mokichi Saito as a student, describing him affectionately as “a kindly old man from the countryside.” At the same time, he viewed his father’s literary interests as little more than a hobby.
This gentle family contrast may have shaped his own position: a man who would become both doctor and writer.
While his father remained within the institution of medicine, Kato stepped outside it, questioning its limits through words. In that quiet divergence, one feels both tenderness and a faint smile of defiance.
The Observer ― Standing Just Outside the Frame
In one essay, Kato recalls childhood banquets where he often felt slightly apart: “I was there, but somehow not part of it.”
This sense of standing at a distance―within the scene yet outside it―foreshadowed his later life as a critic.
As a doctor, he faced patients with empathy; as a writer, he observed himself doing so, studying his own gestures as though he were both participant and witness.
To put it lightly, Kato was the sort of man who, even under the warm glow of a tavern lamp, would retreat to a corner seat and quietly open a notebook.
That small step back―the act of observing rather than joining―became his lifelong way of being in the world.
A Late Baptism ― Faith Without Belief?
Throughout his life, Kato described himself as a nonbeliever, trusting neither gods nor doctrines.
Yet, on August 14, 2008―just months before his death―he received baptism into the Catholic Church.
For a man who had long doubted institutions, it was a final act filled with gentle irony: the critic of all systems chose, at last, to enter one.
Perhaps it was not faith in God, but faith in freedom―the freedom to change one’s mind.
After a lifetime of saying “I do not believe,” he seemed to whisper, “Perhaps I will.”
In that quiet reversal rests a subtle, human laughter―the kind that looks back at life and accepts its mysteries with grace.
This article contains affiliate links.